Fsgrw vs active sky xp
![fsgrw vs active sky xp fsgrw vs active sky xp](https://www.aerosoft.com/media/image/5b/ba/b4/fsglobalrealweather5881f53f30c1c.jpg)
XP weather addons on the market fall into these 2 categories: I knew exactly what to expect and to me, it's the best weather injector for XP, excluding 圎nviro since that's a completely different solution which I'll talk about shortly.
#Fsgrw vs active sky xp full
It won't matter, because it won't actually model the dynamics of a CB, including vertical convection, downdrafts, and temperature variation within the system.įor that, we need a full 3D weather model. My point about CBs is that it won't matter if XEnviro, or Active Sky or anyone else throws a pretty image of a CB into the sim that looks realistic. I just enjoy flying and leave my worries about the next version for later.Īlso HiFi Active Sky for X plane is suppose to be coming out later in the year and will be another alternative to have as well.Īs far as being concern with towering cumulonimbus or high clouds, if I want to see them, I just go to default if I am in the mode for it. Otherwise I could careless because I know they will find a solution in getting them into XEnviro at some point. I am not going to go outside plane, at the point of landing, to measure the height of the clouds or see if they look right when I am trying to focus on landing. That's is something I just don't worry about at the moment. My main concern when landing an aircraft is if I'm getting the condition I expecting to see (rain, wind, overcast with turbulence, low visibility) or what ever the weather report I experience at 2000 or 5000. You get a sense of speed when flying thru them which I'm always impress with, especially when doing takeoff's from LAX.Īs far as being concern with towering cumulonimbus or high clouds, if I want to see them, I just go to default if I am in the mode for it. Otherwise I could careless because I know they will find a solution in getting them into XEnviro at some point. The clouds as far as I am concern, I know its a work in progress although you can get horizon to horizon coverage as well as low lever stratus clouds.
![fsgrw vs active sky xp fsgrw vs active sky xp](https://www.mailsoft.com/shop/ProdukteBilder/efb_main500.png)
With XEnviro I like the way if calculates the correct colors in the sky as well as the winds at all levels. I use XEnviro primarily as my weather engine and when its not working I use FSGRW with the default clouds as a backup. Maybe it will come from a 3rd party developer, but I suspect that Laminar has to step up to the plate and revamp the underlying weather engine before we can get things like vertical convection in CB's, active 3-dimensional storm fronts, etc. We still have fairly primitive weather modeling in X-Plane. I'm still open to other options, if something better comes along. XEnviro is always real weather all the time, without enough fine-tuning for light aircraft that can't handle current conditions. That's one reason I ditched XEnviro, aside from just not looking that great in the mountains. I still want a taste of real weather though, so this (and the default XP weather) gives me enough control. Most of my FSEconomy flights are 200-300 miles, so it doesn't break realism too much to use the same weather for the flight.įor FSEconomy, I'll often cheat and raise the cloud deck if it means I can't land otherwise, because each flight has to be completed.
#Fsgrw vs active sky xp download
So I'll download real weather at the start of a flight, back down the winds if I have to, and leave that setting for the entire flight. With the light to medium GA planes and helicopters I fly, and the areas I like to fly in (Pacific Northwest and UK), real weather is often too windy during part of the year. I don't use Real Weather Connector even though I own it. I'm usually never flying above 16,000 feet and often lower on my FSEconomy runs, and this just looks better to me at lower altitudes than other things I've tried like XEnviro.
#Fsgrw vs active sky xp pro
SkyMaxx Pro here, because it gives me the best depiction of lower-altitude clouds for bush plane flying in the mountains.